Marianne Williamson

Rank 18 of 47
|
Score 84
3/25/2024, 9:23:46 AM
X
In reply to:
Alison S
@SOscarboy2
·
337d
@marwilliamson In the end you will still wholeheartedly support Biden. Perhaps you should take a look in the mirror and ask yourself why your corrupt party is now waging lawfare against opposing 3rd party candidates. https://nypost.com/2024/03/24/op…
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
337d
The conversations we most need to be having are muted by a constant overlay of ultimately meaningless stimulus. The vast majority of Americans are struggling, while the vast majority of our media and political elite ignore it. 3/3
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
337d
With 39% of Americans regularly skipping meals in order to pay their rent and millions selling their blood plasma in order to survive, there is more mainstream news coverage of Trump’s financial problems than of all that misery. 2/3
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
337d
“Your life begins to end on the day you stop talking about things that matter.” - Martin Luther King Jr. 1/3

The statement is part of a conversation that touches on political issues, specifically the support for a political candidate and the actions of a political party. The tone is defensive and confrontational, and the intent seems to be to challenge the accusation made by the other user. The content addresses the behavior of political parties and indirectly the state of public discourse.

  1. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by not engaging in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is defensive and confrontational. [-1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in a form of constructive criticism by challenging the other user to self-reflect, but it could be perceived as bordering on a personal attack due to its confrontational nature.