In reply to:
Mike Faranight
@Leptonmancer
·
335d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
335d
The statement is part of a conversation about a public figure's comments and their consequences, which touches upon issues of free speech, public accountability, and potentially hate speech. The tone is dismissive, and the intent seems to be to avoid repeating offensive content while acknowledging its existence.
- The statement avoids doing harm by not repeating potentially harmful words. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by not spreading potentially vile comments further. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, nor does it engage in personal attacks.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement does not use influence for the betterment of society in a proactive way. [-1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech by acknowledging the existence of the comments without amplifying them. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.