In reply to:
Jake Tapper
@jaketapper
·
684d
The statement is a factual recount of a tragic event following the release of an individual with a history of domestic violence. It is a part of a larger conversation about the resignation of a member of the Illinois Prisoner Review Board, which is connected to public discourse on the criminal justice system, public safety, and governance.
- The statement reports on a violent incident without glorifying or trivializing the harm done, thus adhering to the principle of doing no harm with words. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of the individuals involved by not revealing unnecessary personal details or engaging in victim-blaming. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- While the statement itself does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, it does not hinder these values and indirectly calls attention to the consequences of violence.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments; it sticks to the facts of the case. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- By highlighting the consequences of a decision made by a public board, the statement indirectly uses its influence to prompt a discussion on the betterment of society, particularly in the context of criminal justice. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech by responsibly sharing information relevant to public interest without spreading misinformation. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.