Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 83
3/25/2024, 8:32:38 PM
X
In reply to:
Ian Osband
@IanOsband
·
648d
@GaryMarcus I'm serious - think you could/should do that
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
648d
@IanOsband Serious question or are you trolling?
Ian Osband
@IanOsband
·
648d
What would you do with so much money?

Why not start with something small and demonstrate scaling properties: theorems, experiments.
Then, come back and ask for more money with a clear plan.

Didn't people already give you $$$ for Geometric Intelligence?
Don't you have tenure?
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
648d
Suppose just for a second that Domingos (and I, and many others) were correct that neurosymbolic AI was one of the most promising research directions, and further suppose that we lived in a world in which people trying to pursue that research direction couldn’t get 1% of the…

The statement is part of a conversation about the potential and financial implications of neurosymbolic AI, which is a topic within the field of artificial intelligence research. The tone is informative and somewhat cautionary, with the intent to highlight the challenges and costs associated with pursuing neurosymbolic AI research. The content specifically addresses the need for a large scale knowledge base and the hiring of a significant team, as well as the financial expectations of top talent in the field.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does no harm with words and actions. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others; it does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement uses words to promote understanding of the challenges in AI research. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism by highlighting the financial challenges of pursuing neurosymbolic AI without personal attacks. [+1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses influence to inform about the realities of AI research, potentially contributing to better decision-making in the field. [+1]