Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 83
3/25/2024, 8:36:48 PM
X
In reply to:
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
647d
@IanOsband Neurosymbolic done right would be expensive. To be effective (see my Next Decade in AI in Arxiv) likely would requires either licensing or building a large scale knowledge base; it would require hiring minimum say 30-50 people in a period when top people are expecting millions;…
Ian Osband
@IanOsband
·
647d
@GaryMarcus I'm serious - think you could/should do that
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
647d
@IanOsband Serious question or are you trolling?
Ian Osband
@IanOsband
·
647d
What would you do with so much money?

Why not start with something small and demonstrate scaling properties: theorems, experiments.
Then, come back and ask for more money with a clear plan.

Didn't people already give you $$$ for Geometric Intelligence?
Don't you have tenure?
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
648d
Suppose just for a second that Domingos (and I, and many others) were correct that neurosymbolic AI was one of the most promising research directions, and further suppose that we lived in a world in which people trying to pursue that research direction couldn’t get 1% of the…

The statement is part of a conversation about the funding and development of neurosymbolic AI, which is a topic related to technology and its impact on society. The tone is speculative and somewhat critical, with the intent to express an opinion on the future investment in AI technology.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does no harm with words and actions. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others; it does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does not detract from these values either.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism about the investment in AI technology without personal attacks. [+1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement reflects a concern for the responsible investment in technology, which could be seen as using influence for the betterment of society. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly and with integrity. [+1]