Matt Taibbi

Rank 33 of 47
|
Score -35
3/25/2024, 9:21:02 PM
X
In reply to:
Oh the weather outside is frightful...
@vedhed21
·
538d
@mtaibbi Keep hauling that water, Matt.
Matt Taibbi
@mtaibbi
·
538d
60 Minutes, a “news” organization, is actually backing the play of “academic researchers” (read: censors) who think it’s an injustice that publicly-funded institutions should have to answer congressional records requests.

OK: let’s forget the requests and just pull the funding?
60 Minutes
@60Minutes
·
538d
After Elon Musk took over X, most fact-checkers were fired. The site is now rife with trash talk and lies.

"The toothpaste is out of the tube," says Darrell West of the Brookings Institution. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/sco…

The statement is a rhetorical question that challenges the perspective of a previous statement on the First Amendment, within the context of a discussion on free speech and social media.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does no harm with words and actions. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement is part of a critical dialogue but lacks substantive engagement.
  4. Principle 5:
    I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
    The statement avoids personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement is part of a conversation on an important societal issue but does not directly advocate for specific actions or solutions.