Flora Oddchild 🐭 already hates the newest thing.
@floraoddchild
·
537d
The statement is critical of the Brookings Institution and questions its credibility based on an association with the Steele Dossier. It engages in public discourse by discussing the role of think tanks and the impact of misinformation.
- The statement may be seen as harsh but does not appear to cause harm beyond criticizing the credibility of an institution.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement engages in criticism without personal attacks, focusing on the institution rather than individuals. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The intent seems to be to caution against misinformation, which could be seen as aiming for the betterment of society. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement challenges the credibility of a source, which is a legitimate part of free speech, but it could be more responsible by providing context or evidence for the claims.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.