Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 83
3/25/2024, 9:52:48 PM
X
In reply to:
Vasu Shyam
@vasud3vshyam
·
647d
@GaryMarcus I bet you've posted this before, but do you have a favourite compilation of references to learn more about neurosymbolic AI?
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
647d
The choice AI faces, in my eyes
A. spend 100M + now on neurosymbolic AI in order to discover a new path forward

B. Spend another $5-50 B on LLMs before eventually realizing the value of choice A.

Note: $100B on current approaches couldn’t even build a robust L5 driverless car
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
647d
@IanOsband Neurosymbolic done right would be expensive. To be effective (see my Next Decade in AI in Arxiv) likely would requires either licensing or building a large scale knowledge base; it would require hiring minimum say 30-50 people in a period when top people are expecting millions;…

The statement is part of a conversation on Twitter regarding neurosymbolic AI, its costs, and the strategic approach to its development. The tone is informative and collaborative, with the intent to share knowledge and resources on the topic. The content is a recommendation of individuals who may have recent references on the subject, contributing to the ongoing discussion about AI development strategies.

  1. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by not engaging in any form of harassment or hate speech. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by directing to individuals who could provide further information on the topic, showing a willingness to share knowledge and foster learning. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue by contributing to the conversation without any personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]