Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement is a commentary on the potential overestimation of AI's impact on the economy and society. It references the opinions of AI experts and suggests a more tempered view of AI's future contributions. The tone is cautionary, and the intent seems to be to provoke thought and discussion on the realistic expectations of AI technology.
- The statement does no harm with words or actions. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, avoiding cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by offering a perspective that encourages a realistic approach to AI expectations. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of the AI hype without personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to encourage a more grounded discussion on AI, which could be seen as contributing to the betterment of society by preventing potential disillusionment or misallocation of resources. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech by sharing an opinion responsibly and with integrity, without spreading misinformation. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.