Reposted by Jake Tapper
The statement expresses strong disapproval of Yasmine Pahlavi's decision to give an interview to Jian Ghomeshi, highlighting the serious allegations against him. It suggests that by engaging with Ghomeshi, Pahlavi may be disregarding the gravity of the accusations and the impact on the alleged victims.
- The statement aims to hold individuals accountable for their associations, which could be seen as an effort to do no harm by raising awareness of the issue. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the dignity of the alleged victims by acknowledging the seriousness of the accusations against Ghomeshi. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding of the potential harm caused by normalizing interactions with individuals facing serious allegations. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue but rather expresses outrage, which may not facilitate productive discussion. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its influence to highlight a societal concern, which could be seen as an effort to better society. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement uses the platform to address a public issue responsibly, although the tone could be perceived as less conducive to integrity in discourse.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.