Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 83

The statement is critical and raises concerns about the reliability of AI technology in providing legal advice. It points to a specific instance where an AI chatbot has disseminated incorrect legal information, which could have serious implications for individuals and businesses relying on it.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement highlights a significant risk associated with AI technology, which could potentially cause harm if not addressed. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the dignity of others by pointing out a flaw that could lead to illegal actions and harm to individuals. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement promotes understanding by bringing attention to a specific issue that may not be widely known. [+1]
  4. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement acknowledges a mistake in the implementation of AI technology in a public service role. [+1]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement uses the platform to inform the public about a potential issue with the technology, which is a responsible use of influence. [+1]