Gary Marcus

The statement acknowledges the potential risks of AI technologies and the importance of companies taking adequate steps to mitigate these risks. It suggests that public antipathy could escalate if a significant negative event occurs due to the negligence of AI companies. The tone is cautionary, and the intent is to highlight the importance of responsible AI development and deployment.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement promotes awareness of potential harm and the need for precaution, aligning with the principle of doing no harm with words and actions. [+1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   It respects the dignity of others by considering the potential negative impact of AI on the public. [+1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement encourages understanding of the risks involved and empathy for those who might be affected by AI failures. [+1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   It invites constructive criticism and dialogue about the responsible development of AI. [+1]
5. Principle 5:

   I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.

   The statement does not directly acknowledge any mistakes but implies the need for AI companies to address potential oversights.
6. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   The use of influence here is to caution against complacency and encourage proactive measures. [+1]
7. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The statement upholds the principles of free speech by engaging in a public discussion on AI risks responsibly and with integrity. [+1]