The statement critiques Yann LeCun for not citing the work of his colleagues in a lecture, suggesting that their analysis is relevant and should have been acknowledged. The tone appears to be critical of LeCun's omission.
- The statement does not seem to cause harm but points out a perceived lack of proper academic practice. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by focusing on professional conduct rather than personal attributes. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement encourages a standard of academic integrity, which could promote understanding and empathy within the academic community. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The criticism is directed at the content of the lecture and the omission of citations, not at the individual personally. [+1]Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- The statement calls for the recognition of contributions in academic work, which could influence the practice of citation in the field positively. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.