The statement addresses the role and responsibilities of journalists, which is a matter of public interest and contributes to the civic dialogue on media integrity and the pursuit of truth. The tone is assertive and challenges journalists to prioritize facts over personal opinions. The intent seems to be to promote journalistic integrity and the pursuit of factual reporting.
- The statement encourages journalists to prioritize facts, which aligns with doing no harm as it promotes truthfulness and accuracy in reporting. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not directly address privacy or dignity, but by advocating for fact-based reporting, it indirectly supports respecting the dignity of subjects by not spreading misinformation.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- By urging journalists to be willing to change their opinions based on facts, the statement promotes understanding and empathy, as it encourages open-mindedness and a willingness to learn. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement itself does not engage in criticism or dialogue but sets a standard for journalists to engage constructively with their subjects and audiences.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to advocate for better journalistic practices, which can contribute to the betterment of society by ensuring reliable and truthful information dissemination. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech by emphasizing the responsible use of platforms and integrity in journalism. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.