+1
In reply to:
Kiri
@Kyrannio
·
638d
The statement is part of a conversation about academic integrity and the appropriate response to perceived violations of academic norms. It suggests that public criticism is a suitable response to the actions described by @GaryMarcus, which involve a critic adopting positions they once ridiculed without acknowledging the original source.
- The statement suggests public criticism, which could be seen as harmful if not done constructively. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity by not engaging in harassment or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement lacks a promotion of understanding, empathy, and compassion. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism without personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement aims to use influence for the betterment of society by upholding academic norms. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.