In reply to:
Greg Coppola
@gregcoppola5d
·
543d
The statement is part of a conversation that appears to address the issue of academic integrity and the proper attribution of ideas, which can be considered a matter of public concern, especially within academic and intellectual communities. The tone seems to be one of concern and seeks a solution to the perceived problem of falsifying the historical record.
- The statement does not seem to intend harm but rather points out a potential issue of falsification. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity as it does not reveal personal information or engage in harassment. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does not detract from these values either.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by identifying a problem and asking what can be done about it. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- There is no indication of a mistake being made or corrected in this statement.Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- The statement could be seen as using influence to better society by addressing academic honesty. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech principles by contributing to a discussion on a matter of public concern responsibly. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.