The statement is a critique of the current state of the field of artificial general intelligence (AGI) and reflects on the potential historical perspective on the intellectual diversity within the field. It is a part of a conversation about the investment and progress in different approaches to AI, such as large language models (LLMs) and symbolic/neurosymbolic AI.
- The statement does not appear to do harm with words or actions, but rather expresses a critical viewpoint on the intellectual approach to AGI. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others and does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not directly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does contribute to a broader discussion on the field of AGI.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of the field without personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to critique and potentially better the field of AGI by calling for intellectual diversification. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to contribute to the discourse on AGI. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.