Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement is part of a conversation about the importance of the character of individuals involved in AI development and policy decisions, and the media's coverage of these issues. It is a substantive engagement with a public issue, specifically the integrity and impact of figures in the AI field, which contributes to the civic dialogue on technology and ethics.
- The statement does not appear to do harm with words or actions. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, without engaging in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by highlighting the need for more in-depth discussion on the integrity and global impact of figures in AI. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by pointing out a lack of media coverage on an important issue, without personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to call for betterment in media coverage and public understanding of AI development. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech responsibly, contributing to a discussion on intellectual honesty and policy influence in AI. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.