Gary Marcus

The statement is part of a conversation about OpenAI's ambitions and the potential impact of their projects on employment. It engages in a critique of the organization's actions in relation to their stated charitable mission, which is a matter of public interest. The tone is critical but measured, and the intent is to express skepticism about the project's outcomes while contrasting it with the organization's public statements.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not appear to do harm with words or actions, as it is a critique based on the speaker's perspective. [+1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, as it does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does not detract from these values either.
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in constructive criticism without personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]
5. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   The statement uses influence to critique a public figure's statements, which could be seen as contributing to the betterment of society by fostering critical discussion. [+1]