Gary Marcus

The statement is part of a conversation on Twitter that engages with the topic of artificial general intelligence (AGI) and its potential impact on employment and society. The tone is critical and concerned, with the intent to challenge the aspirations attributed to OpenAI and to discuss the broader implications of AGI on the job market and monopolistic practices. The content involves a debate on the future of AGI, its comparison to historical monopolies, and the role of greed in technological advancement.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not appear to cause harm but rather raises concerns about potential societal impacts of AGI. [+1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement respects privacy and dignity, focusing on the issue rather than individuals. [+1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement aims to promote understanding of the potential consequences of AGI, though it may lack empathy for those with differing views.
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in constructive criticism of OpenAI's perceived goals, without personal attacks. [+1]
5. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   The statement uses influence to raise awareness about the societal implications of AGI, aiming for betterment. [+1]
6. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform to engage in a responsible discussion on AGI. [+1]