The statement appears to be a critical analysis of the investment in autonomous vehicle technology, questioning its value and the lack of substantial returns thus far. It engages with a public issue related to technology, investment, and potentially public policy regarding innovation and transportation.
- The statement does not seem to intend harm but is critical of investment decisions. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity, with no indication of cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does not detract from these values either.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism without personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to critique a sector's investment decisions, which could be seen as aiming for the betterment of society by questioning the allocation of resources. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.