Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement critiques OpenAI's Voice Engine's security and suggests the ease of cloning a public person's voice, raising ethical and security concerns.
- The statement implies a potential for harm through the claimed action of bypassing security. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement suggests a violation of privacy by cloning a voice without consent. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement is critical and calls for transparency, which is constructive. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement raises awareness about security issues, potentially contributing to societal betterment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech but may encourage misuse of technology. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.