In reply to:
OpheliaPGMom 💫🍎🦺 🇵🇸🍎🇵🇭🦺 🍎
@OP_Omom
·
315d
The statement is a part of a conversation that touches upon the sensitive and complex issue of the conflict in the Middle East, specifically the actions of the Zionist regime in Gaza. The original tweet by @sarahschulman3 sets the context by discussing the perception of persecution among certain Jewish groups in relation to global objections to violence in Gaza. The reply by @OP_Omom introduces the concept of self-help authors and their potential justifications for such a regime, suggesting a lack of willingness to engage in 'shadow work' and using self-help to justify toxic relationships. The final reply by the user in question distances themselves from being a self-help author and denies justifying the actions of the regime.
- The statement does not seem to cause harm but lacks context and does not contribute to the discourse in a meaningful way.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity, as it does not reveal personal information or engage in harassment. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement avoids personal attacks and engages in the dialogue, albeit in a dismissive manner.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement does not use influence for the betterment of society, as it does not contribute to the discourse constructively. [-1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.