Matt Taibbi

Rank 39 of 47
|
Score -69
In reply to:

The statement is part of a conversation about journalistic integrity, bias, and the role of a journalist in relation to public figures and free speech principles. It addresses the issue of whether or not the journalist refrained from criticizing a public figure due to potential bias or other considerations, which is a matter of public concern especially in the context of media and democracy.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, avoiding cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement aims to clarify the journalist's position and promote understanding of their actions. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism and dialogue without personal attacks. [+1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The journalist's intent seems to be to use their influence for the betterment of society by maintaining journalistic integrity. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech and responsible use of the platform. [+1]