The statement expresses pride in receiving an award and frames the political climate as a conflict, using divisive language that may not promote constructive dialogue or understanding.
- The statement's war metaphor may be seen as inflammatory and potentially harmful. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of those with opposing views, labeling them negatively. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The language used does not promote understanding or compassion. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not encourage constructive criticism or dialogue. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The divisive language may not contribute to the betterment of society. [-1]Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- While upholding free speech, the statement may not be using the platform responsibly. [-1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.