Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement is a commentary on the potential overestimation of AI's impact on the economy and society. It suggests a level of skepticism regarding the initial expectations of AI's capabilities and its comparison to the dotcom bubble. The tone is cautionary, and the intent seems to be to temper expectations and provoke thought on the realistic outcomes of AI development.
- The statement does no harm and is a cautionary perspective on AI expectations. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, with no indication of cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by encouraging a realistic view of AI's potential impact. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of the AI hype without personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to encourage a more grounded and potentially beneficial societal perspective on AI. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform responsibly, contributing to a public debate on AI. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.