Reposted by Andrew Yang🧢⬆️🇺🇸
The statement is a commentary on American political dynamics and the perceived misconceptions about what is necessary for political leaders to maintain power. It suggests that a much smaller percentage of approval is needed than commonly believed, as long as there is no significant challenge from within their own party. The content of the linked podcast appears to delve into the potential for election reform to improve political discourse and reduce division, which is a substantive engagement with public issues.
- The statement does not appear to do harm with words or actions. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others and does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement indirectly promotes understanding by shedding light on political processes. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of the political system without personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its influence to suggest that election reform could lead to societal betterment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.