The statement is part of a conversation about the development and safety of AI technology, specifically referencing the progress beyond GPT-4. It addresses the issue of technological advancement and its implications for safety, which is a matter of public concern. The tone is critical and suggests a need for innovation and reflection on the development process.
- The statement does not appear to do harm with words or actions, but rather expresses a viewpoint on the development of AI technology. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement encourages new ideas, which could be seen as promoting understanding and compassion in the context of AI safety. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of the AI development process without personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement implies a call to use influence for the betterment of society by advocating for new ideas in AI development. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.