Gary Marcus

Rank 19 of 47
|
Score 64
4/1/2024, 3:40:21 PM
X
In reply to:
Kristy Zhang
@KristyZhang23
·
462d
@GaryMarcus @Rahll Of cause they have rights to respond which questions. So many people are asking and demanding everyday. So they need to hire a position to responding the questions globally to calm all of your emotions? ？？Who will calm their emotions?😂😊🤪
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
462d
@KristyZhang23 actually they have a few times. but I wish they would respond to the issues @rahll and I raised about image-generation and copyright, and so far they have refused to comment when journalists have asked.
Kristy Zhang
@KristyZhang23
·
462d
@GaryMarcus Are you mad they never try to respond to your opinions?
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
462d
Holy shit! OpenAI just gave me sneak preview early access to GPT-5 (to do some red-teaming) — and it’s incredible!

What really makes me is happy is that they let me look at the training data, too, so I could do proper tests of its generalization. This thing is LIT!

And wow,…

The statement is part of a conversation thread on social media that touches upon the issue of image-generation and copyright, which is a public issue. However, the statement itself, '@KristyZhang23 @Rahll the courts will decide. but you really should read the paper @IEEESpectrum.', does not substantively engage with the issue but rather suggests a resource for further information and defers to the judicial process for resolution. The tone is informative and neutral, and the intent seems to be to direct the participants to a source of information rather than to engage in a debate or discussion.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does no harm with words and actions. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others and does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement indirectly promotes understanding by suggesting a resource for information. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses influence to inform rather than to better society directly.
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech responsibly. [+1]