Reposted by Jake Tapper
The statement is a direct engagement with a public issue, specifically the integrity of the 2004 election and the accuracy of claims made about it. The tone is assertive and the intent is to correct misinformation and defend the legitimacy of the election results. The content addresses the claim made by Robert Kennedy Jr. that the election was stolen, which the author refutes based on his experience as John Kerry's pollster.
- The statement aims to do no harm and corrects misinformation, aligning with the principle of doing no harm with words. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the dignity of others by not engaging in harassment or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by clarifying a misconception about the election. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by addressing the disagreement with facts and personal experience, without personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The author acknowledges the desire to support Kerry but corrects the record, showing a willingness to acknowledge and correct mistakes. [+1]Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- By aiming to correct misinformation, the statement uses influence for the betterment of society. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by responsibly using the platform to address public concerns with integrity. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.