Gary Marcus

Rank 18 of 47
|
Score 64

The statement is part of a conversation about the capabilities of AI, specifically GPT-4, in the context of legal examinations. It addresses the public issue of AI's role and reliability in professional fields such as law. The tone is informative and contributes to the ongoing discussion about the implications of AI technology in the law profession.

  1. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others and does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement uses words to promote understanding of AI's capabilities and limitations, contributing to a broader comprehension of the topic. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism about the AI's performance without personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]
  4. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses influence to inform and potentially better society's understanding of AI in the law profession. [+1]