The statement appears to be a commentary on the state of various technology initiatives, suggesting that they are either failing or not living up to their promises. The tone is somewhat cynical, indicated by the use of a gravestone emoji and the phrase 'or nearly dead for the foreseeable future AI.' The intent seems to be to provoke thought or discussion about the future of these technologies and their impact on society. The content lists several high-profile tech projects and implies skepticism about their success or viability.
- The statement does not appear to violate the principle of respecting privacy and dignity, as it does not target individuals but rather comments on technology projects.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does not necessarily violate this principle either. It seems neutral in this regard.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in a form of criticism but does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It remains focused on the technology projects themselves. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement could be seen as using influence to provoke thought and discussion about important societal issues related to technology, which could contribute to the betterment of society if it leads to more informed public discourse. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.