The statement appears to be a list of technological advancements or promises that have either failed to materialize or are perceived as underperforming. The tone seems to be critical or skeptical of the progress in these areas. The intent may be to highlight the gap between the hype and the reality of these technologies. The content is a mix of specific products, services, and broader industry goals.
- The statement does not seem to intend harm but is critical in nature.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not appear to violate privacy or dignity, nor does it engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does not necessarily detract from these values either.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but does not engage in dialogue or personal attacks.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement could be seen as an attempt to use influence to prompt betterment by holding industries accountable, but it lacks a constructive approach.Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.