The statement is a critique of the current state of AI and its reliance on human intervention. It challenges the narrative of fully autonomous systems by listing examples where human support is still necessary. The tone is informative and somewhat skeptical, and the intent is to provoke thought about the reality of AI development versus its portrayal.
- The statement does no harm with words and actions. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others; it does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by shedding light on the reality of AI reliance on human support. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of AI development without personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to inform and potentially better society's understanding of AI. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech responsibly and with integrity. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.