Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement is part of a conversation about the challenges and limitations of current AI technology in practical applications. It expresses skepticism about the fulfillment of past promises regarding driverless cars, automated radiologists, and human-level automated agents, suggesting that sometimes projects are shut down because the technology is not yet capable of delivering on its promises. The tone is somewhat critical but seems to be grounded in realistic expectations about technological progress.
- The statement does not appear to do harm with words or actions, as it is a critique based on observed technological limitations. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by acknowledging the gap between promises and current technological capabilities, which could foster a more realistic perspective on AI development. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism without personal attacks, focusing on the technology rather than individuals or organizations. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.