Gary Marcus

Rank 33 of 47
|
Score -1
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
230d
🪦AI (or nearly dead for the foreseeable future AI)

• Amazon Just Walk Out
• Apple’s Car
• Cruise as L5 self-driving
• Facebook M
• Facebook solving Fake News (as promised to US Senate 2019)
• Google Duplex
• Tesla fleets of robotaxis
• radiologist replacement

What…
4/2/2024, 4:59:30 PM
X
In reply to:
Kömpileir e/acc↗️
@Kompileir
·
230d
@GaryMarcus @theinformation I understand your stance but you have to remember what perspective you're looking at that from and where those claims actually came from.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
230d
@Kompileir @theinformation been hearing that for almost a decade, w driverless cars.

some decade we will have genuine autonomous L5 driving, but it won’t be this one.

you have to distinguish between what you hope will materialize and what we can actually build in 2024. those two are not the same.
Kömpileir e/acc↗️
@Kompileir
·
230d
@GaryMarcus @theinformation Oh and on top of that if Amazon can't figure it out, some other company will.
Kömpileir e/acc↗️
@Kompileir
·
230d
@GaryMarcus @theinformation Duuuuuuude, closing down something and waiting until it's ready is common.

There's always going to be wrinkles to be ironed out. You know this.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
230d
@Kompileir dude, they just closed it down, i linked @theinformation story earlier, and it seems that it couldn’t get to run in accurately real time and needed a bunch of humans in the loop to verify.

it just didn’t work well enough without those humans.
Kömpileir e/acc↗️
@Kompileir
·
230d
@GaryMarcus What do you mean? The amazon grocery stores could easily be stocked by bots at night and allow walk out shopping during the day.

The only pattern I'm seeing is discreditation.

The statement is part of a conversation on social media regarding the progress and expectations of AI technology, specifically in the context of driverless cars and other AI-driven initiatives. The tone is somewhat confrontational and self-assured, with the intent to assert the speaker's expertise and past accuracy in the field of neural networks. The content addresses the public issue of AI development and its practical applications, which is a matter of public interest and debate.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to intend harm, but the confrontational tone may not be entirely harmless.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects privacy and does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement lacks a tone of understanding, empathy, and compassion, focusing instead on self-promotion. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in a form of constructive criticism but also includes a personal claim to authority that borders on an ad hominem argument against 'clowns' who disagree.
  5. Principle 5:
    I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
    There is no acknowledgment of mistakes, but the context does not necessarily call for it.
  6. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement aims to contribute to the discourse on AI, which could be seen as using influence for the betterment of society. [+1]
  7. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech but may not use the platform with complete integrity due to the confrontational nature.