In reply to:
Kömpileir e/acc↗️
@Kompileir
·
230d
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
230d
The statement is part of a substantive engagement with the topic of AI development and its pace, which contributes to the civic dialogue on technology and its impact on society. The tone is analytical and somewhat critical, questioning the current state of AI against the backdrop of previous expectations and promises. The intent is to contribute to the discussion on the trajectory of AI progress and to challenge the notion of continuous exponential growth in the field.
- The statement does not cause harm and is focused on discussing the state of AI technology. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, as it does not target individuals but rather discusses industry trends. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by providing context and inviting further discussion on the topic. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by questioning the current state of AI and referencing industry leaders' opinions. [+1]Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- The statement acknowledges the complexity of AI development and implies that mistakes or overpromises are part of the process. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement uses the platform responsibly to discuss the implications of AI technology for society. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.