Reposted by Jake Tapper
The statement reports on a reaction to a military event, providing information that contributes to public understanding of international relations and sentiments within a specific region. The tone appears to be informative, with an intent to share a perspective on the event's reception.
- The statement reports on a reaction without advocating harm or celebrating violence, thus adhering to the principle of doing no harm with words and actions. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by not revealing identities or engaging in harassment. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or compassion, as it reports on a celebration of violence, which could be seen as lacking empathy for the loss of life. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it simply reports a reaction without providing context or promoting discussion.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- There is no indication of a mistake being acknowledged or corrected.Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- The statement uses its influence to report on a perspective, but it could be seen as divisive rather than contributing positively to society. [-1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech by sharing information, but the responsibility and integrity of the platform could be questioned due to the sensitive nature of the content.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.