Gary Marcus

Rank 32 of 47
|
Score -1
4/2/2024, 9:51:01 PM
X
In reply to:
Derya Unutmaz, MD
@DeryaTR_
·
227d
@GaryMarcus There has been a massive leap from GPT-3.5 a year ago to GPT-4 today; not to mention that Claude 3 is already better than GPT-4 in some aspects. There are also significant applications of these technology to scientific questions, which is accelerating discoveries exponentially.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
227d
No, we are not currently in a period of exponential growth.

GPT-4 is over a year old; nothing has exponentially improved upon it, despite an entire extremely well-capitalized industry trying.

There was a great jump; now there is perhaps a plateau.
Kömpileir e/acc↗️
@Kompileir
·
227d
@GaryMarcus @theinformation I get what you're saying and I don't even necessarily disagree. I'm just saying that the tech from then to now is at least an order of magnitude better than it was.

This growth is still happening exponentially. If it's not good enough today, it very well could be tomorrow.

The statement is part of a conversation on social media about the progress and expectations surrounding AI technology, specifically the development from GPT-3.5 to GPT-4 and other related technologies. The tone is informative and contributes to a debate on the rate of technological advancement in AI, which is a topic of public interest. The intent seems to be to provide evidence that supports the claim of significant progress in AI development, countering the argument that there has been a plateau in growth. The content is factual and contributes to the broader discussion on the state of AI technology.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement aims to inform without causing harm. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    It contributes to a broader understanding of AI development. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in a constructive manner without personal attacks. [+1]
  4. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    It uses influence to contribute to a discussion on technological progress, which could benefit society by setting realistic expectations. [+1]