The statement provides a critical perspective on the performance of GPT-4, suggesting that issues with inaccuracies and errors persist. The tone is somewhat dismissive, and the intent appears to be to temper expectations and contribute to the conversation about the limitations of AI technology.
- The statement does not seem to cause harm but does express skepticism about the technology.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others as it does not target any individuals. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement could be seen as lacking in empathy towards the creators of the technology, but it does not appear to be malicious.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement engages in criticism but does not provide constructive dialogue or solutions. [-1]Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- The statement does not acknowledge any mistakes as it is an opinion.Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement uses the platform to express a viewpoint on AI technology, contributing to the public discourse responsibly. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.