Gary Marcus

Rank 30 of 47
|
Score 12

The statement provides a critical perspective on the use of 'fake AI' in autonomous checkout systems and implies that a more genuine application of computer vision technology could have been more successful. It also expresses disappointment in the management decisions that led to the current situation.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm but rather critiques a business practice. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, as it does not target individuals but rather addresses corporate decisions. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement encourages a technical approach that could potentially lead to better outcomes, promoting understanding of the complexities involved in AI. [+1]
  4. Principle 5:
    I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
    The statement does not acknowledge any mistakes as it is a critique of external actions.
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses influence to critique and potentially guide better practices in tech implementation. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech by sharing an opinion on a public issue responsibly. [+1]