Gary Marcus

The series of tweets in question revolves around a discussion on the state of AI development and the public statements of AI CEOs. The conversation includes criticism, defense, and requests for evidence regarding the claims made by Gary Marcus about AI development and the behavior of AI CEOs. The tone varies from critical to defensive, and the intent seems to be to debate the accuracy and responsibility of public statements made about AI technology.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The tweets do not seem to intend harm, but the discussion could be perceived as negative by those involved.
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The tweets respect privacy and do not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The tweets do not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, focusing more on debate than on fostering positive discourse. [-1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The tweets engage in criticism and dialogue without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]
5. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   The tweets aim to use influence to correct what one party sees as misinformation, which could be seen as bettering society by promoting truth. [+1]
6. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The tweets uphold the principles of free speech and seem to use the platform responsibly, engaging in a public debate on a relevant issue. [+1]