Gary Marcus

Rank 30 of 47
|
Score 18
4/3/2024, 6:38:28 PM
X
In reply to:
JeskaDay
@JeskaDay
·
223d
If the CEO had given up on meaningful work at the first company - unless he gets 25% of control - and threatened to take all the meaningful work to the second company? Yes.

Now what should shareholders do? Give in to the tantrum or sell?
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
223d
If you were leading computer vision at a company that worked on self-driving and your company was on the verge of solving that huge multi-decade challenge, would you leave?

The statement is part of a conversation that discusses the hypothetical scenario of a company on the verge of a significant breakthrough and the decision-making process of an individual considering whether to stay or leave the company. The tone is speculative and contributes to a broader dialogue about corporate loyalty and the impact of individual decisions on company progress.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not cause harm and is part of a respectful discussion on corporate decision-making. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, as it does not target any individual personally. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement promotes understanding by considering the factors that might influence an individual's decision to stay with a company. [+1]
  4. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses influence to contribute to a discussion on corporate ethics and decision-making, which could be beneficial to society. [+1]