In reply to:
Andrew Prock
@andrewprock
·
225d
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
226d
The statement is part of a conversation about the potential and current applications of General AI (GenAI) technology. It engages in a debate about whether GenAI is a use case or a technology, which is a substantive topic related to technological development and its impact on society. The tone is corrective, aiming to clarify a point in the ongoing discussion.
- The statement does no harm as it simply provides a clarification. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity, with no evidence of cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does contribute to the clarity of the discussion.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by clarifying a point without personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- There is no mistake to acknowledge or correct in this statement.Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- The statement uses influence to contribute to a better understanding of GenAI, which could be seen as bettering society by fostering informed discussion. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech by contributing responsibly to the dialogue. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.