Gary Marcus

Rank 32 of 47
|
Score -1
4/3/2024, 10:34:53 PM
X
In reply to:
Derya Unutmaz, MD
@DeryaTR_
·
227d
@GaryMarcus Unfortunately these posts won’t age well in few years …
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
227d
Most of the successful use cases in AI so far - web search, advertisement recognition, coding assistance, rough translation, etc, haven’t required near-perfect accuracy.

Most of the failures - L5 AV’s, domestic humanoid robots, general purpose agents, high-quality translation -…
Market Updates
@MarketUpdates7
·
227d
@lfstevens @GaryMarcus In technology, the final 1-2% is the most difficult part. First 95% can be done by average engineers, it takes geniuses and the creme of the creme engineers to execute the last 5%

The statement is part of a technical discussion on AI development, critiquing past comments made by a public figure in the field. It engages in constructive criticism without causing harm or engaging in personal attacks.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not intend to cause harm and is part of a professional debate. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects privacy and dignity and does not contain harassment or hate speech. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement provides constructive criticism without personal attacks. [+1]
  4. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement contributes to a discussion that could benefit society by informing about AI development. [+1]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech and is made with responsibility and integrity. [+1]