The statement engages with public issues of climate change and energy policy but uses language that may alienate those with differing views.
- The language used could be seen as dismissive or derogatory towards those concerned about climate change, potentially harming public discourse. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy towards differing viewpoints on climate change and energy policy. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement uses dismissive language, which may not foster constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The advocacy for a particular energy policy is present, but the tone and language may not contribute positively to the discourse.Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.