Marianne Williamson

Rank 15 of 47
|
Score 116
4/5/2024, 1:27:48 AM
X
In reply to:
Julie Jeanne Tyler
@juliejtyler
·
223d
@marwilliamson @lpeoples50 I really don’t think, nor do many other great minds, that a two state solution as possible, after what has occurred.
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
223d
@lpeoples50 All three: Ceasefire. Release the hostages. Plans for a two-state solution.
KC Peeps
@lpeoples50
·
223d
@marwilliamson When do we hear release the hostages and the bombing will stop? I don't want to hear you politicians talk about the Palestinian people without also stating we demand hostage release. The poor Israeli women who are being abused everyday will they are hostages. Talk about them!!!!
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
223d
I'm tired of hearing that Biden is frustrated, or Biden had a tense call with Bibi, or Biden is angry, or that he is "warning" him that he must do better in the future.
For too many people now, there will be no future.
I want to hear that Biden said "NO MORE. Not one…

The statement is part of a conversation on social media that addresses the complex issue of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, specifically discussing the viability of a one-state versus a two-state solution. The tone is serious and concerned, and the intent is to express a viewpoint on a potential political solution to an ongoing conflict, which is a matter of public concern and debate.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to do harm with words and actions, but expresses a concern for potential violence. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others and does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement lacks a promotion of understanding, empathy, and compassion, focusing instead on the potential negative outcomes of a political solution. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism of a political solution without personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses influence to express concern over a societal issue, aiming for the betterment of society by preventing potential conflict. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech, using the platform responsibly to express a viewpoint on a public issue. [+1]