Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement is part of a discussion on the use of publicly available data by generative AI companies, highlighting the nuances and legal considerations of such data usage. It references a conversation with a journalist who provides insight into the complexities of data rights and copyright laws. The statement and the conversation it refers to engage with the public issue of data privacy and the ethical use of data in AI development, which is a topic of societal relevance and contributes to the civic dialogue on technology and privacy.
- The statement does no harm and is informative in nature. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity by pointing out the protections on publicly available data. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding of a complex issue. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue without personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to inform and educate on an important public issue. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform responsibly. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.