Gary Marcus

Rank 17 of 47
|
Score 91

The statement is part of a conversation thread on social media that touches upon the topics of public sentiment towards AI, wealth inequality, and the potential for civil unrest. The tone of the statement seems to be a mix of concern and anticipation for future events. The content suggests a belief that the rise of AI and wealth inequality could lead to social upheaval.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly incite harm but does seem to anticipate or predict riots, which could be interpreted as harmful. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not appear to violate the privacy or dignity of others, nor does it engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It seems to predict conflict without offering solutions or understanding. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it is more of a prediction without engaging those with opposing views. [-1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement does not clearly use influence for the betterment of society; it predicts negative outcomes without suggesting positive actions. [-1]