Gary Marcus

Rank 20 of 47
|
Score 74

The statement is part of a conversation on Twitter that touches upon moral questions related to wealth inequality and the potential societal consequences of such inequality. The user references the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, suggesting that it provides guidance on how individuals should act in society. This conversation can be considered public discourse as it engages with societal issues and moral considerations.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement promotes the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which is inherently aimed at doing no harm. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by referencing a document that upholds human dignity. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    By referring to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the statement encourages understanding and compassion for human rights. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement itself does not engage in criticism or dialogue but references a document that could foster constructive dialogue.
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The reference to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights suggests an intent to use influence for societal betterment. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech by contributing to a public conversation and using the platform responsibly. [+1]